The Water Efficiency Blogs

The Blogger

Elizabeth Cutright Water Efficiency Editor

More from this blogger

  1. Bridging the Gap
  2. Mind the Gap
  3. Back to School
  4. The Future of Southwest Water
  5. What medium for your message
  6. We (Might) Need a Bigger Boat
  7. Worst Case Scenarios
  8. Healthy Conservation
  9. Sustaining Supply
  10. Secret Handshake
  11. Second City Water
  12. Spills, Bills and Climate Change
  13. When Water and Energy Collide
  14. Blue Fever LEED
  15. Recycled Winter
  16. Energy Awareness
  17. Pollution and Source Protection
  18. Conveyance Catch Up
  19. Volume and Vintners
  20. Smithsonian Smarts
  21. Imbedded Industry
  22. Shake, Rattle, and Roll
  23. Low-Flow Hubris
  24. High Efficiency Plumbing
  25. Water Saving at the Corporate Level
  26. Reuse Wrap Up
  27. Household Water Use
  28. What's Your Waterprint
  29. Lawsuits, Pipelines, and One Tiny Fish
  30. One Million Acre-Feet
  31. Rainwater Ordinance
  32. Gauging Risks
  33. Batten Down the Hatches!
  34. WaterSense for New Homes
  35. Tri-State Co-Op
  36. Nuclear Desalination
  37. What does a worst-case scenario look like
  38. All Bark and No Bite
  39. Subsidized Water
  40. Keeping It Local
  41. Private or Public
  42. What's Your Standard
  43. WE Professionals Take a Bow
  44. Pipe Bursts, News at 11
  45. Drought, Demand, and the GW Bogeyman
  46. Smart Water Use
  47. Delta Update
  48. Alternative Sources
  49. Water Saved Is Water Earned
  50. Mile-High Metering
  51. Smart Water Grid
  52. Seeing Into the Future
  53. Can Two Rights Make a Wrong
  54. Thinking Big, Going Small
  55. The Dead Zone
  56. Pipe Dreams
  57. Interdependency
  58. Low-Tech Leak Detection
  59. Money-Management Musical Chairs
  60. A First for Rainwater Harvesting
  61. Purpose and Intent
  62. Drought Dangers
  63. All Eyes on the West
  64. Climate Chaos
  65. Preemptive Strike
  66. A Place With No Meters
  67. Water Buffaloes in the Delta
  68. Wildfires and Water Conservation
  69. National Drinking Water Week
  70. Finally Teamwork
  71. Tainted Water
  72. Hit them in the pocketbook!
  73. The Place to Be
  74. Where the WE's Are
  75. Let's Be Friends
  76. Free Market Water
  77. Role Model
  78. Budget Basics
  79. Breaking It All Down
  80. Unsung Heroes
  81. It's Raining, It's Pouring..
  82. Meter Management
  83. Finding Funding
  84. Turning Lemons Into Lemonade
  85. New Rules for a New Year
  86. Is it a water grab or a reasonable solution
  87. Drops and Crops
  88. Dear Santa..
  89. Not Just Storm Clouds on the Horizon
  90. Wondering After a Winter Break
  91. Virtual Water
  92. Water and Compromise
  93. Reuse Revisited
  94. Turf Revisited
  95. Taking it to the Next Level
  96. The Nine Steps
  97. Water Lemons
  98. To Turf or Not to Turf
  99. The Wall Street Ripple Effect
  100. Let it Rain!
  101. Another Perspective
  102. De-Centralizing
  103. Personal Responsibility Versus Government Action
  104. Field Trippin' in the Garden
  105. Grand Theft Water
  106. Drowning Dragon
  107. Money Changes Everything
  108. Sharks! Tomatoes! Astroturf!
  109. Titans of Industry - Should Big Business Control The Tap
  110. Welcome to the New Site!
view all

WE Editor's Blog

October 6th, 2008 1:37pm PST

News You May Have Missed

Posted By Elizabeth Cutright 3 Comments

If you didn’t get a chance to read about the almost-$10,000 water bill issued to an Ogden, Utah man, it’s well worth taking a look. (For the full story, go here.)

In August, Rick Baur was billed $9,700 for the alleged use of 1.4 million gallons of water. Baur does not run a car wash or own a large farm, nor does he live on a large piece of landscaped property (by his own calculations, he irrigates less than a third of his 2-acre property). Adding to the mystery, from December to January he and his wife were on vacation, and so virtually no water was used during that time.

Unfortunately for Baur, Ogden’s water utility manager Craig Frisbee stands by the bill, stating, “When water goes through a meter, they [customers] are obligated to pay for that.” And what was going on with that meter? Well, according to George Benford, the city’s public services director, the meter was spinning at 72% capacity during the disputed billing period – a level of water usage that Benford acknowledges is not often seen at a residence and is “the level you would use when you get to a manufacturing facility.”

The city is adamant that the Baurs must pay the entire amount of the bill, although there is some possibility that the final charge will be reduced based on a hardship credit. Obviously to the uninitiated, this seems like another trip down the rabbit hole – in what strange universe could one household use 1.4 million gallons of water? Is this a case of extreme water theft? And what responsibility does the city have to investigate the cause behind this eye-popping meter reading? 

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

Paitch13

October 7th, 2008 2:53 PM PT

Interesting. The subsequent bill for August is also extremely high for what the customer's claim is their normal usage habits. I think the city has an obligation to investigate because if this amount of water is running through the meter, then there is apparently a tremendous amount of waste occurring and they should want to prevent that. I find it hard to believe there is no manifestation of a leak of this size. Though I am not familiar with the geography there, where is it all going? Are there caverns underground that can accomodate this amount of water? Is the ground there able to absorb this water and not show some signs of potential problems arising from this drenching? And, if it is not actually running through the meter, then the city has some apologizing and paying back to do. This screams for an investigation for the benefit of all involved.

j_haessly

October 7th, 2008 11:38 AM PT

As I read this article, I thought about the few ways this could possibly have happened. Is there a leak, was there theft involved, is the meter malfunctioning, is it a combination of these three things? The homeowner says he was on vacation during the time of the high water use, but what is still troublesome is the fact that his bill was nearly $2000 the next month when he was home and when he should have been monitoring his use very closely. What is going on here? I certainly hope that this man has access to a good water auditor who can help him.

Al

October 8th, 2008 3:33 PM PT

Sounds like a big fish story to me!

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*